A Little Less Nail Biting?
In an earlier post I talked about the explosion of sustainable energy indexes since 2004 (particularly during the past 12 months when 14 of the 29 indexes I listed have been announced – see A Quick Guide to Sustainable Energy Equity Indexes, October 22nd). Recently I went looking for Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) that might be based on these indexes.
What I found was a bit of a surprise - at least for me. Despite the creation of 29 sustainable energy indexes only six corresponding ETF’s appear to have been developed to date. Admittedly sustainable energy is a small investment niche and perhaps six funds are plenty for meet the needs of interested investors. However, based on the number of indexes, I was expecting see a wider range of new ETF’s. Probably unrealistic on my part.
Powershares is clearly the most active fund manager in this regard, fielding four of the six sustainable energy ETF’s found. And WilderShares is the most popular provider of indexes in this sector, with three of the Powershares funds based on WilderShares indexes. Briefly, the six funds are:
1. Powershares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio Fund (AMEX: PBW)
Replicates the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, focusing on green and renewable sources of energy and technologies which facilitate cleaner energy.
2. Powershares Cleantech Portfolio Fund (AMEX: PZD)
Tracks the Cleantech™ Index, which focuses on cleantech companies judged to have the greatest capital appreciation potential and includes a significant proportion of energy related businesses.
3. Powershares WilderHill Progressive Energy Fund (AMEX: PUW)
Based on the WilderHill Progressive Energy Index, comprised of US-listed companies focused on transitional energy bridge technologies, with emphasis on improving use of fossil fuels.
4. Powershares Global Clean Energy Fund (AMEX: PBD)
Based on the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, composed of companies focusing on green and generally renewable sources of energy and technologies facilitating cleaner energy
5. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge US Liquid Series Index Fund (NASDAQ: QCLN)
Tracks the NASDAQ Clean Edge U.S. Liquid Series Index, focusing on publicly traded, U.S. clean energy stocks companies engaged in manufacturing, development, distribution and installation of emerging clean-energy technologies.
6. Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy Fund (NYSE: GEX)
Replicates the performance of the Ardour Global Index (Extra Liquid), which targets companies engaged in the alternative energy industry.
Although, the mandates differ (albeit within a narrow niche), there appears to be a lot of overlap in the holdings of the funds. Looking at the top 10 holdings of each, 10 companies are held in two or more funds and the most popular stock, First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), is held by four of the six funds.
Fund |
Start Date |
Net Expense Ratio (%) |
Performance
(% - since inception) |
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge US Liquid Series |
January 2007 |
0.65 |
19.05 |
Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy |
May 2007 |
0.60 |
25.50 |
Powershares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio |
March 2005 |
0.70 |
15.73 |
Powershares Cleantech Portfolio |
October 2006 |
0.71 |
28.38 |
Powershares WilderHill Progressive Energy |
October 2006 |
0.73 |
17.74 |
Powershares Global Clean Energy |
June 2007 |
0.75 |
12.43 |
Why ETF’s?
As I’ve noted previously, the risks associated with investing in individual stocks, particularly in the small and medium-cap stocks that make up much of the sustainable investment sector, may be greater than many investors are prepared to take on. Small and medium caps are likely to be more volatile and less liquid than more established companies. These companies and the sustainable energy sector in which they operate are still evolving, and while this offers greater growth potential than more established companies or sectors, it may also make the stocks more sensitive to changing market conditions.
Funds, including ETF’s and mutual funds offer the opportunity for partial diversification, escaping some of the risks in investing in individual equities. (Although, because these funds are focused on a single industry segment they do not offer the same opportunity for diversification as a broad-based index such as the S&P 500 or a corresponding fund.)
Compared to mutual funds, which can offer similar diversification opportunities, ETF’s are generally more cost effective. For example, while the average (net) expense ratio for the six funds discussed herein is 0.69%, the (net) expense ratio for the Calvert Global Alternative Energy Fund discussed in an earlier post (see Calvert on Alternative Energy, November 1st) is 1.85%.
For small investors, investing in indexes and funds can also save you time researching and tracking individual stocks. The index originators take on the task of finding acceptable companies so you don’t have to.
So, if you still want to invest in the sustainable energy sector, these funds offer a cost-effective alternative with a little less nail biting than you might otherwise experience.
Further Resources About ETF’s
How Mutual Funds Work: Exchange Traded Funds, Efficient Market Canada
Exchange-Traded Funds: A better alternative to mutual funds?, CBC News
Two Good Reasons to Invest in ETF’s (And One Reason Not To), Sonya Morris, Morningstar Investing Specialists
Exchange Traded Funds: A Low Cost and Tax Efficient Investment, Claymore Investments Inc.
Yahoo Finance – Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF) Center